Doesn't that just bring back memories? Your brother was secretly
slipping his peas to the dog under the dinner table; or your sister
was making out in the park with her clandistine boyfriend; or your
cousin was eating earthworms in the backyard. Breathless with
the power to wreak destruction, you ran to your parents or teacher
or other authority figure, eagar to tattle.
And what were you
told? "You just mind your own business, young man..." Chastised, you shrank into the background to lick your wounded pride.
Maturing
is like that. Through trial and error and faux pax, one learns
the difference between the need to assert, and the social need to
stay out of other people's private matters.
It's a complex set
of unwritten rules learned by trial and error. Everywhere one
finds people making poor choices, acting badly, doing themselves or
others a hurt. Mostly they are to be ignored...because it's
none of your business. There are exceptions to this, such as
when a child is endangered or when someone is putting others at actual
physical risk. But mostly, in a free society, everyone is to
be left to work out his own destiny.
But that concept of live-and-let-live
is under fire, has been for some time now...and the usual set of suspects,
our keepers in government, are at the bottom of it.
It started
long ago with "helmet laws" written to protect motorcyclists...from
their own, presumably wrongheaded, wishes. It carried on with
such government "help" as the Food Pyramid, constructed to help us
benighted peons eat properly, and carried on to Bicycle Helmet laws,
the National Speed Limit of 55 miles per hour, "Hate-Speech" legislation
and the like.
And then mandatory Safety Belt Use traffic legislation...which
was passed in Ohio, as in many other states, with the promise that
it would never, EVER be the primary basis for traffic stops or used
to generate revenue.
Now this:
News item: Maryland
Governor Robert L. Ehrlich ordered state police to cease using night
vision to stop motorists for not wearing seat belts. (Associated
Press, 6/6/2005)
Police state, meet Nanny State.
The United
States is, or once was, a singular place. In virtually all of
the world, the idea of the police battalion knocking on the door generated
fear and terror, the promise of weeping and gnashing of teeth. Suicide, there on the spot, is often a reasonable, thoughtful alternative. What lay ahead for such unfortunates frequently includes dungeonlike
incarceration, a star-chamber tribunal, and a summary sentence - frequently
a capital one.
Not here. As every first-grader has been
taught, the policeman is our friend. He's likely to be a boy
from the neighborhood...you drank beer with his dad, you know his
kids. When he's at your door it's because you called for him
- something is wrong and he's here to help you.
That's the way
it was intended, from the creation of the Union. Most power,
including virtually all criminal law, was vested at the state or local
level. This was precicely to prevent the institution of a reign
of terror - to place power at low levels, where citizen control and
input could counter it.
And where local sensibilities were respected. If New York wanted to legalize abortion; and Idaho wanted to make
it a capital crime, that was in keeping with the structure of our
union. Criminal law was the province of the soverign States;
reflecting the desires of the voting citizen - who was intended to
be ultimately soverign.
Alas, our keepers have found ways around
this obstacle in their quest for the Perfect Society. It started
with Federal monies to aid in law enforcement...whereas the wise and
powerful Federal Government first takes money directly from the citizen,
in an abuse of the Income Tax code, and then passes it back to the
local and state agencies. In an apparent windfall gift.
And
then, as with all such gifts, it starts adding strings.
The first
such naked attempts were in the age of the allegedly fuel-saving National
Speed Limit, where states were threatened with removal of their money-fix
unless they instituted high-percentage compliance. This continues,
with Clean Air standards, with Federal standards on everything from
consumer products like gasoline; to child-welfare authorities and
hate-speech ordinances; to trigger-lock gun laws and dozens of other
regulations.
Once, long ago, there were such things as moral-social
suasions, as a way to influence behavior. Some behaviors were
see as "good," laudable, to be encouraged. Some were accepted
as normal and went unremarked.
Some were considered annoying,
and were met with shunning, with gossip and namecalling. Others
were offensive enough to merit confrontation. And of course,
the worst of these, murder, assault, theft or destruction of property,
were labeled criminal.
This was the progression..but.liberals
have no respect for any sort of suasion other than the law. If it's not illegal, it should be celebrated; and conversely, if some
people are bothered by it, then it should be made illegal. Moral
standards or social pressures are not part of their worldview.
At
the same time the Imperial Court was finding a "right to privacy"
which covered, not your computer hard-drive nor your gun cabinet,
but your daughter's right to terminate her ill-concieved fetus's life,
it has been cracking down on your choice to wear or not wear automobile
safety belts; or to hire or not hire members of sanctioned minorities;
to say or not say ethnic jokes or derrogatory remarks, to spank or
to reason with your two-year-old. There is, in their view, only
one right way to live - their way - and they stand ready to promote
it, not with persuasion but with the power of the State.
In their
quest for the Perfect Society, liberal legislators and liberal jurists,
while excusing cold-blooded murder by perps who hadn't reached an
arbitrarily-defined age of "adulthood," have criminalized personal
choices and private behaviors which, while traditional in America,
are odious to their peculiar understanding of how citizens should act
and choose and live and interact.
Here we have killers excused
from their acts because of administrative variances; while police
stage surveillance on large numbers of possible violators - of busybodytraffic laws. Laws not enacted by the consent of the populace;
but instead ordered from on high...from a faceless, unanswerable bureaucracy.
Here
we have, not only behaviors proscribed by law, but mandatory types
of conduct...where not only does the law tell you what you must NOT
do, but what you MUST do, what you MUST choose and say and admit to.
Not
to prevent injury or deception. No...it's done for your own
good, and to prevent the hurt feelings of others.
It's long past
time to assert our OWN rights. "States' Rights" has become a
dirty phrase, due to generations of liberal miseducation...but the
abuses of centralized, unaccountable power has become more egregious
than anything ever done in Mobile or Selma or Topeka.
It is past
time. In an era where the extralegal Supreme Court is defecating
on the plain wording of the Constitution its members took an oath
to preserve, it is time to assert the rights of the States; of local
control; of the citizen; and to call the Federal Goverment - all three
branches of it - to account for its intrusive, unlawful action.
It
must start with State governments and individual legislators. And their actions and selection start with us, the voters...as we
support and encourage their actions to curb the bureaucracy and remove
rogue jurists.
It's our business now. Our representatives,
our proxies, have so far failed us.
In the sunshine on Bestor
Plaza, Chautauqua, New York
June 26, 2005
* * * * * * * *
JustPassinThru is a non de
plume for a blue-collar middle-class Everyman, who lives and works
in the Midwest
Copyright© CHCH and JPT/Roaring Forks, 2005. Free use with attribution.