The so-called “party of diversity” has once again demonstrated that diversity is only celebrated when one agrees with its platform. According to a recent Washington Times article, blacks are now fair game for ridicule by liberal Democrats, if the black in question happens to be a conservative Republican.
Maryland Lt. Governor Michael S.
Steele, who is seeking a seat in the U.S. Senate, just happens to
be a black, conservative Republican. And it just so happens that operatives
of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee targeted Mr. Steele,
and Mr. Steele alone, by illegally obtaining a copy of his credit
report. Somehow I don’t think the Lt. Governor approached the opposition
party in the hopes of obtaining a loan from them.
In addition
to having his credit file commandeered, Steele was pelted with Oreo
cookies during a campaign appearance, and called an “uncle Tom”. The
Lt. Governor was also depicted as a black-faced minstrel on a black run, liberal web log (picture since removed, evidently under
pressure).
So how did black Democrat leaders react to such hostility
directed toward the first black man to win a statewide election in
Maryland? With anger and indignation? With profound sadness? If you
thought that the “oppressed” would find such treatment wrong, think
again. A campaign spokesman for the former president of the NAACP
(and coincidentally a candidate for U.S. Senate), Kweisi Mfume, had
this to say, “there is a difference between pointing out the obvious
and calling someone names.” Evidently calling someone insulting names
isn’t calling someone insulting names, as long as it is directed toward
your opponent. Of course this is the same party that produced a standard
bearer who explained to the nation that “is” didn’t necessarily mean
“is”. (Of course, let us not forget that he was our first “black president”,
but I digress).
In addition to Mfumes’ spokesman, a black Baltimore
delegate, Salima Siler Marriott offered this gem, “because he (Steele)
is a conservative, he is different than most public blacks, and he
is different than most people in our community”.
As if there
was any doubt about this clannish mindset, State Senator Lisa A. Gladden,
Democrat from Baltimore made the remark that “party trumps race, especially
on the national level”.
So there you have it. The “party of diversity”
has no room for diversity when it comes to blacks who think for themselves
and dare stray from the liberal plantation.
The recent death
of Rosa Parks makes this story one of supreme irony. Who would have
thought that the courageous struggle for equal rights throughout the
50’s and early 60’s, fought and won with the heart, soul, and for
some blacks, even their very lives, would someday lead to a time when
they had exchanged one “massa” for another? A people who cried out
for freedom and justice, only to wind up being lorded over by a party
and its ideology with an iron fist.
Make no mistake about it,
the current liberal leadership of the Democrat party cares not one
iota about “diversity” – it cares only about power. It is for that
reason that Michael Steele bothers liberals in general, and black
liberal “leaders” in particular. Maryland’s Lt. Governor could very
easily siphon off black votes – black votes that liberal Democrats
need to maintain their power base. Liberal Democrats have been “buying”
black voters for years with social programs – in the process replacing
Daddy with a welfare check and maintaining a viscious cycle of unwed mothers and its inherent inner city poverty. Consider also the
endless screaming of “racism” at the drop of a hat, that is the favored
method employed by Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton and other so-called
black “leaders”. They do so in order to keep their phony baloney jobs
as spokemen for the black community. Without the “racism” boogeyman,
their gravy train would end.
In this more modern age, their
scare tactics are no longer as effective, so they have resorted to
attacking those blacks like Mr. Steele who refuse to march in lockstep
with them. The fact is that as more and more blacks escape poverty
and gain a piece of the American dream for themselves, the less likely
are they to vote for liberals. Kweisi Mfume and his spokesman know
this as well as other Democrat party leaders. It’s why they are willing
to insult Michael Steele, or anyone else who threatens their power
base. The times are indeed a’ changing, and black people, who as a
whole are far more conservative than either their “leaders” or the
national Democrat party, are discovering that they don’t need liberals
and their programs in order to succeed. The notion of a Michael Steele,
and what his elevation to the U.S. Senate would mean, scares liberals
to death. For, everyday middle-class blacks however, it could mean
the start of a second emancipation.
Copyright© 11/7/2005 by
Chip McLean