Standing on principle can sometimes be a lonely proposition. This
past week, Democrat Senator Joe Lieberman found himself in that very
position. Amid the cacophony of criticism coming from his own party
(and some from across the aisle) toward the Bush Administration's
handling of the Iraq war, Lieberman voiced his unequivocal support
for the US effort to bring democracy to that corner of the world.
Lieberman
made his remarks in an opinion piece published on the editorial pages
of the Wall Street Journal. The column, entitled "Our Troops
Must Stay", followed his recent visit (his fourth, in fact, in the
last 17 months) to Iraq.
The article contained some good
information on progress being made by the Iraqi military, as they
continue on their path to self-reliance. Even more stirring were his
words on the Iraqis themselves, who are apparently far more optimistic
about the future of Iraq (82% believe their lives will be better a
year from now) than is the American public. The Iraqis have gone to
the polls in massive numbers twice now to vote for their interim national
government and their new constitution, and even more are expected
to turn out a third time when they vote for their new full-term government
on Dec. 15. The Iraqis have shown a courageous determination, despite
the very real dangers they face daily, in exercising a right that
so many Americans take for granted – the right to vote.
Senator Lieberman was at his most poignant when he characterized
the war as being one between 27 million and ten thousand - that being
the number of Iraqis wanting to live in freedom versus the number
of various terrorists whose “wretched causes will be set back if Iraq
becomes free and modern”. As Lieberman said, we are fighting on the
side of the 27 million because the outcome of the war is critically
important to the security and freedom of America. He makes the point,
one that too many of us have forgotten along the way, that it isn’t
just the Iraqis who stand to lose by the U.S. withdrawing before they
are fully capable of defending themselves, it is the rest of the world,
including our own nation that stands to lose.
Withdrawing too
early and handing Iraq over to the terrorists would cause not only
instability in the region, but would also cause the terrorists, as
Lieberman said, to become “emboldened to strike us directly again”.
That is a scenario we must absolutely prevent.
There has been
much debate about the pre-war intelligence, just as there has been
about whether or not going into Iraq was the right decision. Both
are legitimate questions in the arena of debate, but one thing that
should not be debated is leaving before it is prudent to do so. Regardless
of whether or not it was initially the correct decision to go into
Iraq should have no bearing on the greater and more relevant issue
of securing the region, now that we are there.
Joe Lieberman
understands this, and has left politics at the water’s edge – something
that too many of his colleagues in Washington have failed to do. There
was a time when both parties put aside their differences for the greater
good of the country when we were at war. Taking the stand he has taken
has certainly not won him any popularity contests with many within
his own party, particularly among the far left fringe. Indeed the
folks at the liberal activist 527 group MoveOn.org have already intimated
that they may back a Democrat challenger to Lieberman in his re-election
bid next year in Connecticut.
There are many issues on which
I would disagree with Joe Lieberman, but those differences do not
diminish the man in my estimation. He reminds me of another great
Democrat senator, Hubert H. Humphrey. Humphrey was a liberal of course
(although by today’s standards not overly so), and very often was
at odds on the Senate floor with Barry Goldwater (the quintessential
conservative). Their battles on the issues were legendary, but despite
those differences, they were friends.
I recall when Humphrey
passed away some years back, that Goldwater made some very kind remarks
about his old rival – especially about how much Humphrey loved his
country. And then he said, “Hubert was a patriot”. Coming from Barry
Goldwater, no compliment could have been greater.
I think that
if Goldwater were alive today, he would say the same about Joe Lieberman.
Copyright© 12/5/2005 by Chip McLean
=====================================================